Mediatek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855: comparison
Mediatek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
The Mediatek Helio P60 is a higher mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones that turned into brought in early 2018.
It is synthetic in a 12 nm FinFET (12FFC) technique and is ready with 4x huge ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and strength green ARM Cortex-A53 cores in clusters (big little).
- The cores can attain a frequency of up to 2 GHz. The processor additionally integrates an ARM Mali-G72MP3 GPU and a committed AI processing unit.
- Furthermore, the incorporated radio helps Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL) LTE, 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.2, and FM radio.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-cease phone and pill SoC that Qualcomm introduced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a rapid ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 284 GHz and 3 in addition rapid ARM Cortex-A76 overall performance cores, which could attain up to 242 GHz.
Related–Kirin 970 vs snapdragon 845
Snapdragon 690 Vs Snapdragon 768G: specifications and benchmark
Exynos 7904 Vs Snapdragon 660 comparison in details
These are complemented via way of means of 4 strength-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock as much as the most of 1.8 GHz. The higher ‘Prime Core’ clock velocity must offer drastically higher single middle overall performance than the Snapdragon 845, however we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall quick of the Apple A12 Bionic.
- The new SoC must have as much as 45% faster single-middle overall performance and 35% multi-middle overall performance than its predecessor.
- Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s cap potential to hold its overall performance whilst confronted with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980.
- The SoC additionally integrates the brand new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm guarantees will supply up to 2 Gbit/s most download velocity over LTE Cat.20 and as much as 316 Mbit/s add speeds.
- The Snapdragon 855 may be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too.
Qualcomm has additionally advanced the incorporated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8×8 Sounding, and helps as much as 802.11 ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilize the 60 GHz mm Wave band for up to 10 Gbit/s net speeds.
- The Hexagon 690 DSP has passed through the maximum revisions of that which Qualcomm has incorporated into the Snapdragon 855.
- The new DSP consists of a neural processing unit (NPU) with committed Tensor-cores that could execute as much as 7 trillion operations in line with 2nd alongside the CPU and GPU.
- In quick, the Snapdragon 855 must be 3 instances quicker than the Snapdragon 845 and instances quicker than the Kirin 980 SoC.
The Snapdragon 855 additionally has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to comprise a Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) that could carry out intensity calculations in films at as much as 60 FPS.
The Snapdragon 855 must supply real-time portrait modes or be capable of stumble on items with highly low strength consumption.
- The integrated reminiscence controller helps as much as sixteen GB LPDDR4x RAM (4 x sixteen-bit). Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% extra compute units (ALUs) than the Adreno 630, at the same time as Qualcomm claims that it must be 20% faster than its predecessor.
- We presently do now no longer recognize what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will perform at as Qualcomm did now no longer announce those at some point in the declaration of the Snapdragon 855.
- Qualcomm will produce the Snapdragon 855 on the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) the usage of a 7 nm FinFET technique. The transfer to 7 nm production must make the SD855 20% extra green than the SD845.
- Qualcomm has now no longer formally introduced the thermal layout strength (TDP) of the SD855, however we suspect that the SoC will attain a most of 5W and could common round 3.5 W beneath neath load.
Mediatek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 comparison.
Comparison of the technical {characteristics traits} among the processors, with the Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 on one facet and the MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 on the opposite fact.
The first is devoted to the telephone sector, it has 8 cores, 8 threads, and a most frequency of 2.8GHz. The 2d is used at the telephone segment, it has a complete of 8 cores, 8 threads, and its faster frequency is about to 2.0 GHz.
The following desk additionally compares the lithography, the variety of transistors (if indicated), the quantity of cache reminiscence, the most RAM reminiscence capacity, the kind of reminiscence accepted, the date of first broadcast, the most variety of PCIe lines, the values
Specifications of Mediatek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Processor | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 | ||||||
Market | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
Family | Snapdragon | Helio P | ||||||
Part number(s), S-Spec | SDM845, Qualcomm Napali | P60, MT6771 | ||||||
Release date | 2018 Q1 | 2018 Q1 | ||||||
Lithography | 10 nm FinFET LPP | 12 nm HPM | ||||||
Transistors | 5,300,000,000 | – | ||||||
Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
Base frequency | 1.9 GHz | 2.0 GHz | ||||||
Turbo frequency | 2.8 GHz | – | ||||||
Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A75 @ 2.8 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.0 GHz | ||||||
Cache memory | 2 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
Max memory capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
Memory types | LPDDR4X-1866 | LPDDR4X-800 | ||||||
Max memory channels | 4 | 2 | ||||||
Max memory bandwidth | 29.9 GB/s | 13.41 GB/s | ||||||
TDP | 9 W | 5 W | ||||||
GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 630 | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | ||||||
GPU execution units | 2 | 3 | ||||||
GPU shading units | 256 | 48 | ||||||
GPU clock rate | 710 MHz | 800 MHz | ||||||
GPU FP32 floating point | 737 GFLOPS | 86.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
AnTuTu | 276,473 | 140,000 | ||||||
(Android) PassMark CPU Mark | 18,890 | 6,040 | ||||||
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 2,337 | 1,470 | ||||||
(Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 8,483 | 5,576 | ||||||
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 66.8 GFLOPS | 38.8 GFLOPS | ||||||
(Multi-core / price performance) Performance / price ratio | 14 pts / Rupees | 15 pts / Rupees | ||||||
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 943 pts / W | 1,115 pts / W | ||||||
(Multi-core / global cost performance) Performance / global cost ratio | 14 pts / Rupees | 15 pts / Rupees | ||||||
Note | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 | ||||||
Reviews | 9,478 | 6 | ||||||
Amazon | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 | ||||||
(Average) New price on Amazon | 35,910 Rupees | 16,560 Rupees | ||||||
(Average) Used price on Amazon | 32,140 Rupees | 11,280 Rupees | ||||||
eBay | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 | ||||||
(Average) New price on eBay | 43,810 Rupees | 25,590 Rupees | ||||||
(Average) Used price on eBay | 22,190 Rupees | 9,520 Rupees |
Price: Price can extrude over time. For technical reasons, they’re now no longer up to date in actual time. This is best a means of the outcomes on the primary web page of every product, whether or not new or used.
Shipping fees have now no longer been integrated. To understand the very last rate of the product, please visit the shape of the shop. If no rate is indicated, it way that we did now no longer discover any gives over the last update.
We can higher examine what are the technical variations among the 2 processors. We see that the 2 processors has an equal variety of cores, the most frequency of Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 is greater, and that the thermal dissipation electricity of MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 is less. Both have been produced in the identical year.
Ratios: We first don’t forget the common for the brand new rate if available, the common for the used rate otherwise. Performance / international value ratio: This is the ratio of overall performance on Geekbench 4, divided with the aid of using the value of the product + the value of power over 5 years for a period of use of thirteen hours in step with day.
Performances:
Performance assessment among the 2 processors, for this we don’t forget the outcomes generated on benchmark software program consisting of Geekbench 4.
AnTuTu – Total rating
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 276,473
MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 140,000
The difference is 97%.
AnTuTu is one of the maximum famous apps in the globe to assess and examine the electricity of a cell tool with the competition. It checks above all of the electricity of calculation, the show of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in three-D, the control of the reminiscence, the switch of statistics.
Android PassMark – CPU Mark
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 18,890
MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 6,040
The difference in overall performance is 213%.
PassMark is a benchmarking software program that plays numerous overall performance checks which include top numbers, integers, floating-point, compression, physics, prolonged instructions, encoding, sorting. The better the rating is, the better is the tool capacity.
On Android 64-bit:
Geekbench 4 – Multi-center & single-center rating – Android 64-bit
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 8,483
2,337
MediaTek MT6771 Helio P60 5,576
1,470
In singles, the difference is 59%. In multi-center, the differential hole is 52%.
Geekbench 4 is an entire benchmark platform with numerous forms of checks, which include statistics compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF report rendering, matrix computation, Fast 4ier Transform, three-D item simulation, image editing, reminiscence testing.
This permits us to higher visualize the respective electricity of those devices. For every result, we took a mean of 250 values at the well-known benchmark software program.
Is the Helio P60 better than Snapdragon 845?
We could see definitely wherein P60 positioned at. MediaTek now already repositioned itself as a mid-variety supplier as opposed to a player, to combat Snapdragon, Huawei, or Apple head to head. Grab all its lovers from white-bins brands.
Different functions determine exceptional results. The first-class X30 of Mediatek can’t suit up 710 or arising 675. As for 710, this Soc supply comparable overall performance like the 2017 Flagship Snapdragon 835 in CPU, however a whole lot worse GPU.
From theory, Snapdragon has the first-class GPU across this industry. Even Apple A12 can’t suit up. (845’s Adreno 540 generate 567GFLOPS as A11 generate like 350, and A12 is A11 *150%=approximate 500G, 845 could be like seven-hundred or so.
Hey Guys, I’m Dev from India. I am in digital marketing field since 2016, I’m a Blogger and digital marketing nut – it’s my career, hobby, and passion. I enjoy blogging.