Which is better Snapdragon 730 or Exynos 9611?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611
Comparison of the technical traits among the processors, with the Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 on one aspect and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 on the opposite aspect.
The 1st is devoted to the phone sector, it has eight cores, eight threads, and the most frequency of 2.2GHz.
The 2nd is used at the phone segment, it has a complete of eight cores, eight threads, and its rapid frequency is ready to 2.3 GHz.
The following desk additionally compares the lithography, the range of transistors (if indicated), the quantity of cache reminiscence, the most RAM reminiscence capacity, the sort of reminiscence accepted, the date of the first broadcast, the most range of PCIe lines, the values received in Geek bench four and Cinebench R15, in addition to a mean charge.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (SD730 Mobile Platform) is a quick mid-variety ARM-primarily based totally SoC in large part determined on Android pills and smartphones. It integrates 8 cores (octa-core) divided into clusters.
A rapid overall performance cluster carries ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at as much as 2.2 GHz and an electricity performance cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at as much as 1.eight GHz. Depending on the workload handiest unmarried clusters or all cores can run at distinctive clock speeds.
The chip consists of quite a number different functions like a quick X15 LTE radio (800 Mbits Cat 15 down load, one hundred fifty Mbps Cat thirteen upload), one of the first Wi-Fi 6 wi-fi radios (802.11ax), satellite tv for pc positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou, Galileo), USB-C three.1, Spectra 350 ISP, Hexagon 688 DSP, H.265 4K30 video en- and decode, and LPDDR4X-3733 dual-channel reminiscence controller and an Adreno 618 Grafikkarte.
The Snapdragon 730 is synthetic withinside the contemporary-day eight nm system at Samsung.
Samsung Exynos 9611
The Samsung Exynos 9611 (or Exynos 7 Series 9611) is a mid-variety SoC for Android-primarily based totally smartphones and pills. It integrates eight processor cores in clusters (big little concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at as much as 2.three GHz for traumatic obligations and 4 ARM Cortex A53 at as much as 1.7 GHz for electricity performance. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, 9611 helps better resolutions for the rear confronted camera.
The included LTE modem helps 4G at as much as six hundred Mbps download and one hundred fifty Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.zero also are included withinside the chip.
The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 snapshots card gives 3 clusters and a guide for Vulkan, DirectX 12, and OpenGL ES three.2.
The Exynos 9611 is synthetic withinside the contemporary-day 10nm FinFET system and consequently fantastically electricity green and additionally applicable for smaller smartphones.
Specification: –
| Processor | Snapdragon 730 | Samsung Exynos 7 | ||||||
| Market | Smartphone | Smartphone | ||||||
| Family | Snapdragon | Exynos | ||||||
| Part number with there S-Spec | SM7150-AA | Exynos 7 Octa 9611, s5E9611 | ||||||
| Release date | 2019 Q2 | 2019 Q3 | ||||||
| Lithography | 8 nm LPP | 10 nm LPE | ||||||
| Cores | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Threads | 8 | 8 | ||||||
| Base frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz | ||||||
| Energy cores | 6x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Silver @ 1.8 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz | ||||||
| High performance cores | 2x Qualcomm Kryo 470 Gold @ 2.2 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.3 GHz | ||||||
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 2 MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 8 GB | 6 GB | ||||||
| Memory types | LPDDR4X-1866 | LPDDR4X | ||||||
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| Max memory bandwidth | 14.93 GB/s | 11.92 GB/s | ||||||
| TDP | 5 W | 8 W | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 618 | ARM Mali-G72 MP3 | ||||||
| GPU execution units | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 48 | ||||||
| GPU clock rate | 610 MHz | 850 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 435.2 GFLOPS | 86.4 GFLOPS | ||||||
| AnTuTu | 218,630 | 155,300 | ||||||
| (Android) PassMark CPU Mark | 16,380 | 11,190 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 2,543 | 1,645 | ||||||
| (Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 6,832 | 5,303 | ||||||
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 61.3 GFLOPS | 34.9 GFLOPS | ||||||
| (Multi-core / price performance) Performance / price ratio | 18 pts / Rupees | 12 pts / Rupees | ||||||
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 1,366 pts / W | 663 pts / W | ||||||
| (Multi-core / global cost performance) Performance / global cost ratio | 18 pts / Rupees | 11 pts / Rupees | ||||||
| Note | 4.6 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 | ||||||
| Reviews | 860 | 148 | ||||||
| Amazon | Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 | ||||||
| (Average) New price on Amazon | – | – | ||||||
| (Average) Used price on Amazon | – | – | ||||||
| eBay | Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 | ||||||
| (Average) New price on eBay | – | 32,920 Rupees | ||||||
| (Average) Used price on eBay | – | – |
Price: – Expenses can extrude over time. For technical reasons, they’re now no longer up to date in actual time. This is the handiest a mean of the effects on the primary web page of every product, whether or not new or used. Shipping fees have now no longer been integrated.
To recognize the very last charge of the product, please visit the shape of the shop. If no charge is indicated, it way that we did now no longer locate any gives over the last update.
We can higher examine what are the technical variations among the 2 processors. We see that the 2 processors have an equal range of cores, the rapid frequency of Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 is bigger, that the PDT of Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 is lower. Both had been produced withinside the identical year.
Ratio: – We first don’t forget the common for the brand new charge if available, the common for the used charge otherwise. Performance / worldwide fee ratio: This is the ratio of overall performance on Geek bench four, divided with the aid of using the fee of the product + the fee of power over five years for a period of use of thirteen hours in step with day.
Performances:
Performance assessment among the 2 processors, for this we do not forget the effects generated on a benchmark software program which includes Geek bench four.
AnTuTu Score
Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 218,630
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 155,300
The distinction is 41%.
AnTuTu is one of the maximum famous apps withinside the globe to assess and examine the energy of a cellular tool with the competition. It exams above all of the energy of calculation, the show of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3-D, the control of the reminiscence, the switch of statistics.
Android PassMark – CPU Mark
Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 16,380
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 11,190
The distinction in overall performance is 46%.
Pass Mark is a benchmarking software program that plays numerous overall performance exams along with high numbers, integers, floating-point, compression, physics, prolonged instructions, encoding, sorting. The better the rating is, the better is the tool capacity.
Geekbench 4 – Multi-core And Single core score
Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 6,832
2,543
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 5,303
1,653
In single-core, the distinction is 55%. In multi-core, the differential hole is 29%.
Geek bench four is a whole benchmark platform with numerous varieties of exams, along with statistics compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF document rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3-D item simulation, picture graph editing, reminiscence testing. This lets in us to higher visualize the respective energy of those devices. For every result, we took a median of 250 values at the well-known benchmark software program
Specification: –
CPU
| Architecture | 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 470 Gold (Cortex-A76) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 470 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L3 cache | – | 1 MB |
| Process | 10 nanometers | 8 nanometers |
| Transistor count | 3 billion | – |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 618 |
| Architecture | Bifrost | Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Cores | 3 | – |
| Number of ALUs | – | 128 |
| FLOPS | 259 Gigaflops | 385 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | – | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor | N/A | Qualcomm Hexagon 688 DSP |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Max display and resolution | 2560 x 1600 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera and resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 120FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | 384 kHz/32 bit |
Connectivity
| Modem | – | X15 |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 15 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 Mbps | Up to 800 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS |
Info
| Announced | September 2019 | April 2019 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | – | SM7150-AA |
| Official page | Samsung Exynos 9611 official site | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 official site |
Don’t Forget to Read More Comparison Topics:-
- Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 712 Comparison in Details
- Exynos 7904 Vs Snapdragon 660 comparison in details
- Snapdragon 675 VS Exynos 9610 Comparison In Details
Conclusion:-
So, Here we reached to the end of the article, I think you May Like this post (Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611). If you have still any doubts about the comparison, then feel free to ask in the comment section below.
